"Stalker" is a cinematic labyrinth that challenges its audience with its complexity and depth. Unlike Tarkovsky's more accessible "Solaris," "Stalker" demands intense concentration and philosophical insight to unravel its intricate narrative and dense dialogues. It's a film that might leave many baffled on their first viewing, but its richness lies in this very challenge. The movie masterfully juggles different realities and delves into existential themes, using a sci-fi backdrop that bends time and reality. Set in a dystopian Russia, its slow cinematography immerses viewers in an apocalyptic world, contrasting sharply with the stalker's humble home.
This complexity has led to extensive analysis and discussion, leaving little unexplored in terms of its themes and philosophical undertones. Its rich tapestry of ideas requires not just attentive viewing but also a deep understanding of its myriad themes, often necessitating the insights of a seasoned researcher or philosopher to unravel its many layers. 'Stalker,' with its dense and multi-faceted exploration of existential questions, stands as a pinnacle of thought-provoking cinema that continues to invite analysis and interpretation.
My favorite scene from the movie is the scene on the stalker's view on music, which stands out for his reflection on human experience and faith. Here, Tarkovsky transcends the film's predominant themes of existentialism and dystopia, offering a moment of introspective clarity. The stalker describes music as not just an arrangement of sounds, but as a force that deeply touches into human emotions. He sees music as a conduit to faith, a calming front against existential dread. This dialogue suggests that music, in its ability to evoke profound emotions, hints at the existence of something beyond our tangible reality. It’s a recognition of beauty and harmony in a world otherwise depicted as bleak and desolate. The stalker's interpretation of music goes beyond just appreciating it at face value. He perceives it as a tangible proof of a higher order, a parallel to the possibility of an afterlife. This perspective is a striking contrast to the otherwise grim and uncertain world of the Zone. For him, the mere existence of music, with its capacity to synthesize harmonious, emotion-evoking sounds, is a testament to the existence of sense and reason in the universe.
This scene is a key moment in the film, as it captures the stalker's belief system early on. His faith in something greater than the physical world is not based on religious dogma or scientific evidence, but supported by the experiential and emotional impact of music. It's a subtle yet powerful expression of hope and spirituality in a narrative largely defined by ambiguity and philosophical complexity. Tarkovsky uses this dialogue to offer a glimpse of optimism and spirituality, reinforcing the film's exploration of the profound questions about human existence and the nature of belief.
---
"Stalker" distinguishes itself by splitting its three main characters into distinct ideologies with different views on humanity.
In the movie, the exploration of the characters' journey into the Zone brings their evolving perspectives into sharp focus with the compliment of long takes and beautiful cinematography, particularly concerning the Zone's supernatural, mystifying ability to reveal and fulfill human desires. This revelation has a profound impact on each character, shaping their understanding and beliefs in different ways.
Focusing on each individual character, starting with the stalker, who guides the others to the Zone, remains committed in his faith. Despite the skepticism of his companions, his belief in the Zone as a place of revelation and spiritual truth is unchanged throughout. He continues to see the Zone as a sanctuary for discovery and enlightenment, a view that stands resilient even in the face of doubt cast by the Writer and the Scientist.
The writer's journey leads him to a place of skepticism and introspection. He starts to view human desire as a complex and often treacherous force, deeply entangled with subconscious fears and insecurities. He grows to believe that the pursuit and fulfillment of these desires might not lead to true fulfillment or enlightenment, suggesting that it may be better for these desires to remain unfulfilled, avoiding the potential pitfalls and eternal turmoil of achieving them.
The scientist, initially driven by the desire to exploit the Zone for scientific discovery, he undergoes a significant transformation in his viewpoint by the movie's conclusion. Upon realizing the Zone's power to materialize human desires, he adopts a more philosophical stance on the nature of good and evil. He contemplates the ethical implications and potential dangers of exploiting such a nuanced force. His shift in perspective leads him to consider drastic measures, such as using a 20-kiloton bomb to destroy the Zone, to prevent any misuse. This decision reflects a deep concern over the consequences of tampering with forces beyond human understanding and the inherent risks of seeking control over such enigmatic power. The Scientist's journey in the film exemplifies the complex moral dilemmas posed by the Zone and the broader themes of power, ethics, and the human condition.
Tarkovsky further climbs my list of my favorite directors, and even if slow cinema can be a chore to sit through, I believe if you compose yourself enough to sit through his genius, vision, and methodical work, it will be worth it in the end.
